After QE3’s announcement in mid September there was some concern that the effect of QE on the market had eroded because the S&P 500 proceeded to sell off by 5%. It could be true that QE is losing its efficacy, but it’s worth noting that true balance sheet expansion didn’t really start until mid November because of the mechanics of MBS purchases. It therefore may or may not be coincidental that MBS started to show up on the Fed’s balance sheet around the same time that the S&P 500 found a bottom.
Apple’s 10% decline today represents a $45B loss of market value, which is a larger amount than the market cap of 85% of the companies that make up the S&P 500. $45B is roughly equivalent to the market value of COST, NKE or MDT.
Since its peak at $659B in September AAPL has lost $230B worth of value. That’s more than the market cap of all but seven US companies, nearly equal to the entire value of MSFT, CVX and GE!
In fact, AAPL’s loss in market value has been so large so fast that it is entering the realm of macroeconomic proportions. Since September, AAPL’s market cap decline has been almost equal to the amount of money that the Fed has injected into the economy via QE3, which sits at ~$250B.
|QE3 measured as increase in MBS/Treasuries at Fed plus commitments to buy MBS|
After yesterday’s post forecasting that we could see a 40% y/y increase in the monetary base in 2013, I thought it might be good to look at a long term chart of the monetary base to put that number into context. Below is a chart showing the rolling y/y increase in the monetary base since 1918. The only other time there has been such a steep increase in the US base was during the depression/WWII era during which there were three different periods of 20% annual growth in the base.
To go along with the previous post forecasting when a 6.5% unemployment rate could occur, below is some analysis on how fast unemployment typically drops when we are in a period of falling unemployment. Since 1949 there have been 10 periods of falling unemployment. On average the unemployment rate falls by about 7 bps per month when it is declining.
Although the “scariest jobs chart ever” which has made the rounds on the internet implies that unemployment is falling at a much slower pace than it has in past cycles, in reality, we’re basically in line with the average rate of decline (the unemployment rate just spiked from a lower base than it had in the past.)
As part of today’s statement, the Fed acknowledged that it would be maintaining the current QE rate until unemployment hits 6.5% or inflation gets out of hand (paraphrase). Below is an estimate of when unemployment could hit that level based on an extrapolation of the current pace of decline. Since peaking in late 2009 at 10%, the unemployment rate has fallen on average at about 6 basis points per month (.06%). If it continues at this pace, the unemployment rate would hit 6.5% in mid 2014.[Note that the decline has not materially picked up much pace in 2012. In 2012 the rate declined by an average of 7bps per month. At this pace 6.5% would occur just a few months earlier in 2014.]
Well, it’s official. As was widely expected, the Fed announced today that it would increase the size of QE to $85B per month from $40B per month. Below is an updated forecast of what the US monetary base could look like to start 2015 if QE lasts that long (for the record, my money says it wont). At its peak growth rate, the base will increase by ~40% y/y. Under the previously announced program the base was slated to grow by a robust 17%. By 2015 the monetary base could be nearly 6x the size it was in 2008.
Although QE3 was announced almost 2.5 months ago, the mortgages that the Fed has been purchasing have only just started to hit the Fed’s balance sheet over the last couple of weeks. The monetary base has continued to hold flat, but mortgage holdings have ticked ever so slightly higher.
Even though QE3 has now been in effect for over a month, the monetary base hasn’t budged since it was announced. As I’ve documented before, the monetary base has been highly correlated with commodity prices since QE began in 2008, so the fact that the base has not broken out higher could help to explain why crude and gold are also failing to make new highs.
The monetary base is an indicator which I always pay close attention to because it has been highly correlated with the price of oil and gold since 2009. Since QE3 was announced I have been paying even closer attention to the measure than usual, but it hasn’t yet moved as one would expect it to. Over the last several weeks the monetary base has fallen as the Fed has purchased more MBS for reasons that I don’t totally understand (likely some technicality and timing of the way assets are accounted for in the Fed’s H.4.1 release). I would expect this to reverse in the coming weeks, but until it does, it may help to explain why oil has been weak since QE3 as well.
The S&P 500 is up 1.2% currently following the announcement of new QE. This is not unlike the pattern that we saw in 2010 where the market rallied out of the summer on the expectation that there would be more QE and rose again on the day that QE was announced. However, over the next 8 trading days immediately following the announcement of QE2 the market fell 4.4% as it consolidated. It then continued to rally for about 2.5 more months.